Boomerang Model In International Relations

The “boomerang pattern” developed by Keck and Sikkink, to activate
The “boomerang pattern” developed by Keck and Sikkink, to activate from www.researchgate.net

Introduction

The boomerang model is a concept in international relations that describes the process through which non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and transnational advocacy networks (TANs) can influence the policies and actions of states. It highlights the power of NGOs and TANs to “throw back” their influence on their own governments by leveraging international connections and partnerships. This article explores the boomerang model in international relations and its significance in shaping global politics.

The Boomerang Model Explained

The boomerang model is based on the idea that NGOs and TANs can bypass their own governments and appeal directly to international organizations, foreign governments, or other NGOs in order to put pressure on their governments to change their policies or take specific actions. This occurs when domestic political opportunities for change are limited or closed off, leading advocacy groups to seek external support.

For example, let’s say there is an NGO in Country A advocating for human rights. However, the government of Country A is repressive and does not respond to domestic pressure. The NGO can then reach out to international organizations, such as the United Nations, or partner with NGOs in other countries to raise awareness about the human rights abuses in Country A. This external pressure can create a boomerang effect, influencing the actions of the government in Country A.

Stages of the Boomerang Model

The boomerang model consists of several stages that NGOs and TANs go through to achieve their objectives:

1. Domestic Suppression

In this stage, NGOs and TANs face limitations or outright suppression by their own governments. This could be due to restrictive laws, lack of political will, or other barriers to advocacy. As a result, these groups seek alternative avenues to promote their causes.

2. Network Building

In this stage, NGOs and TANs establish connections with international organizations, foreign governments, and other NGOs. They build alliances and partnerships to amplify their message and increase their influence.

3. External Pressure

Once the network is built, NGOs and TANs use their international connections to put pressure on their own governments. They leverage international platforms, engage in lobbying efforts, and raise awareness about the issues they advocate for.

4. Domestic Impact

The external pressure generated through the boomerang model can have a significant impact on domestic policies and actions. Governments may feel compelled to respond to international pressure, take corrective measures, or change their stance on certain issues.

Examples of the Boomerang Model in Action

The boomerang model has been observed in various contexts and has led to significant changes in global politics. Here are a few notable examples:

1. Human Rights Advocacy

Human rights organizations often employ the boomerang model to hold governments accountable for their actions. NGOs like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have successfully used international pressure to push for reforms and raise awareness about human rights violations.

2. Environmental Activism

Environmental NGOs and TANs have also utilized the boomerang model to combat climate change and promote sustainability. Through international partnerships and advocacy, organizations like Greenpeace and WWF have influenced governments to adopt more environmentally friendly policies.

3. Global Health Initiatives

NGOs working in the field of global health, such as Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, have employed the boomerang model to address health crises and influence government responses. Their international networks and expertise have helped shape policies and mobilize resources.

Conclusion

The boomerang model in international relations highlights the power of NGOs and TANs to bypass their own governments and influence global politics. By leveraging international connections and partnerships, these advocacy groups can generate external pressure that compels governments to take action or change their policies. The boomerang model has proven to be an effective strategy in various areas, including human rights, environmental activism, and global health. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the role of NGOs and TANs in shaping international relations will continue to grow.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does the boomerang model differ from traditional lobbying?

The boomerang model differs from traditional lobbying as it involves leveraging international connections and partnerships to exert pressure on domestic governments. Traditional lobbying mainly focuses on influencing decision-makers within a country.

2. Can the boomerang model be used by any type of NGO or TAN?

Yes, the boomerang model can be used by any type of NGO or TAN that aims to influence global politics. However, the effectiveness of the model may vary depending on the issue, resources, and network of the organization.

3. Are there any limitations to the boomerang model?

Yes, there are limitations to the boomerang model. It relies on the existence of international networks and partnerships, which may not be accessible to all NGOs and TANs. Additionally, governments may choose to ignore international pressure or retaliate against advocacy groups.

4. How can individuals support the boomerang model?

Individuals can support the boomerang model by becoming informed about global issues, supporting NGOs and TANs through donations or volunteering, and advocating for change within their own communities.

5. What are some challenges faced by NGOs and TANs using the boomerang model?

Some challenges faced by NGOs and TANs using the boomerang model include limited resources, political opposition, and the need to navigate complex international networks. Building effective partnerships and maintaining momentum for change can also be challenging.